As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
The following brief overview offers consideration of why quantitative research on terrorist leader targeting may be a dead-end or at least of questionable use from a policy-maker's perspective. It presents the quest for identifying best policies against terrorism as largely futile given the multi-dimensional and reflexive nature of the strategic interaction of terrorists and counter-terrorists. Developing a doctrine for counterterrorism is not impossible, however. The criticism offered here merely posits that such a doctrine can never be used without case-specific considerations, with special regards to the large number of strategically relevant variables over which decision-makers have weak control or perhaps none at all.