Preface
We are glad to present the proceedings of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Advanced Study Institute, Strengthening National Public Health Preparedness and Response for Chemical, Biological and Radiological Agents Threats, held in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, on June 19 to 29, 2006. We are grateful to the NATO Science Programme both for sponsoring its ASI series, and for recognizing the global importance of public health preparedness against terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.
With gratitude we recognize and thank those organizations whose funding made the Institute possible. Funding for participants came from NATO in the form of a conference grant. The Institute was sponsored by the University St. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia, which also provided logistical support, a hospitable atmosphere, tours of Macedonian national health facilities, and host country events. The Hotel Continental, Skopje, was our venue; it provided lodging, meals, all meeting rooms, and a fine overall setting for the ASI. Additionally, many participants' travel costs were funded in part or in whole by their own organizations.
We were honored to have had such a fine roster of military and civilian public health experts from NATO nations and NATO Partner nations. The number of participants included a rich variety of experts in all aspects of the program, who excellently represented a broad array of eligible countries. A core panel of participants contributed to final discussions and conclusions of the Institute. New relationships and collaborations were forged during this Institute. The recorded product is represented in this book, but perhaps more valuable were the new relationships and potential joint projects made possible in Skopje.
The scheduled format of the ASI was as follows: there were two morning sessions and two afternoon sessions daily. Presentations were organized according to scientific discipline, with these groupings – the American Medical Association's (AMA) two-day Basic Disaster Life Support course; biological, radiological and chemical threats; computer simulation and emergency planning; information security – approach and management; biodefense; risk communication; health policy; public health law and preparedness; “special needs” populations in preparedness planning; special topics; and psychological aspects of disasters. There was also a brief avian influenza table-top exercise.
We believe that this report's data, recommendations, and conclusions are neither final nor all-inclusive. The participants' group experience and knowledge regarding public health emergencies has continued, driven by those ongoing, always-changing terror threats that promise to kill, maim and disrupt the lives of the civilized world. We plan continued dialogue on the recommendations found herein, and hope that future similar workshops will occur.
Finally, we urge that that this Institute's recommendations are accepted and implemented by clinicians, researchers, and other scientists motivated by special interest in public health preparedness, as well as by national and NATO leaders and policy
makers who are positioned to make a difference. Public health response to emergencies requires extensive, coordinated, considered efforts of the combined military and civilian public health resources of all NATO nations and NATO Partner nations.
Curtis Cummings, Carol Larach