As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
Meeting the UK’s net-zero greenhouse gases target by 2050 requires transdisciplinary engineering, it requires efficient exchange and collaboration between engineering and social science, between engineers and policy makers within the national government. Based on ethnographic fieldwork conducted within the UK’s department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), this paper explores how technical and policy expertise were mobilized and combined in a recent change in utility-scale solar policy. Taking a model developed by BEIS’ engineering advice team in collaboration with the established renewable policy team, this paper looks at what it means to give and receive engineering advice in the context of utility-scale solar regulation. Looking at the model design process from both the engineer’s and policy advisor’s perspectives highlights how concepts of expertise, disciplinarity compatibility and opposition impact policy and outcomes. The modelling process was successful in helping the negotiation and reconciliation of technical and social concerns to enable a change in utility-scale solar regulation satisfactory to industry and constituents. By drawing on this case, this paper ends on a wider discussion about how the generation of mutual trust and development of interactional knowledge between engineers and policy advisers enables TE in policy practice.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.