Search
 
loader loading subjects...
cover
Legal Representation and Reasoning in Practice: A Critical Comparison
Sotiris Batsakis, George Baryannis, Guido Governatori, Ilias Tachmazidis, Grigoris Antoniou
31 - 40
10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-31
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume 313: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems
Abstract

Representation and reasoning over legal rules is an important application domain and a number of related approaches have been developed. In this work, we investigate legal reasoning in practice based on three use cases of increasing complexity. We consider three representation and reasoning approaches: (a) Answer Set Programming, (b) Argumentation and (c) Defeasible Logic. Representation and reasoning approaches are evaluated with respect to semantics, expressiveness, efficiency, complexity and support.

Download
Creative Commons License