As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
The dimensional variations inherent in a manufacturing process are the reason for the existence of the acceptance tolerance concept on a product characteristic. The geometric quotation system has many advantages over the Cartesian system by avoiding ambiguity in the interpretation on form, orientation and location errors. The two main standards that define the geometric quotation on a mechanical design are ISO1101/2012 and ASME Y14.5-2009. However there are differences in interpretation even when the same symbols are mentioned by these standards. It is, therefore, important to know these differences to ensure the quality for companies that provide products to customers who apply different standards of geometric control. This article presents the results of perpendicularity control using each standard and their difference as an example of the impact when choosing one of them. In addition, the article shows preliminary results of a still on-going survey indicating that these differences between the standards are still little known among professionals in the areas involved in Brazil.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.