Search
 
loader loading subjects...
cover
A Dialectical Approach for Argument-Based Judgment Aggregation
Martin Caminada, Richard Booth
179 - 190
10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-179
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume 287: Computational Models of Argument
Abstract

The current paper provides a dialectical interpretation of the argumentation-based judgment aggregation operators of Caminada and Pigozzi. In particular, we define discussion-based proof procedures for the foundational concepts of down-admissible and up-complete. We then show how these proof procedures can be used as the basis of dialectical proof procedures for the sceptical, credulous and super credulous judgment aggregation operators.

Download
Creative Commons License