Engineering the right software requirements under the right environment assumptions is a critical precondition for developing the right software. Requirements completeness, in particular, is known to be among the most critical and difficult software engineering challenges. Missing requirements often result from poor risk analysis at requirements engineering time. A natural inclination to conceive over-ideal systems prevents adverse conditions from being properly identified and, when likely and critical, resolved through adequate countermeasure requirements.

The paper overviews a model-based approach for integrating risk analysis in requirements engineering. The approach is aimed at anticipating exceptional conditions in which the target system should behave adequately. In a goal-oriented modeling framework, obstacles are introduced as as preconditions for the non-satisfaction of system goals. Following the identify-assess-control cycle of risk analysis, the paper reviews a variety of formal techniques available for generating obstacles, for assessing their likelihood and the severity of their consequences, and for resolving them through countermeasures whose integration in the system model results in increased requirements completeness.