As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
In this study, we analyzed the process of collaborative problem solving from the viewpoint of thinking styles. Thinking styles are defined as a preferred way of thinking, and here three styles, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial styles[1] were adopted. In this study, we constructed groups whose members display different thinking styles, and they solved a creative task collaboratively. The results are summarized as follows. (1) It was difficult to effect distributed collaboration based on thinking styles. If anything, dominative collaboration by Legislative thinking as the leader was observed. (2) Only with the Legislative style could we anticipate the degree of Proposing. Thus, Legislative thinker participated actively in Proposing, whereas Executive and Judicial thinkers did not do so in Doing and Evaluating, respectively.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.