As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
Videoendoscopic (VES) instruments have poor force transmission properties and often require surgeons to employ awkward hand and arm positions. In order to compare the physical workload of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery, we collected long-duration EMG records from the thumb (thenar compartment) of six surgeons perfonning suturing and knot tying in a training box using both open and VES techniques. EMG signals were acquired using a LabVTEW® Virtual Instrument and analyzed using a Modified Exposure Variation Analysis (MEVA) algorithm. Standard EMG indices and the MEVA analysis demonstrated significantly greater amplitude and duration of EMG signals using VES technique compared to open technique. Our results suggest that the use VES techniques requires a greater intensity of physical effort than open surgery techniques.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.