As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
This paper is effectively subtitled “Considerations of Requirements for Programmable Laws of Probabilistic Higher Order Logical Thought”. Why such a need? Issues such as privacy, security, bandwidth, and computational power demand not a central analyzing agency, but roaming agents to analyze the global explosion of medical data in many hundreds of petabytes distributed across many sites. They will send back only the conclusions, not the source data. But how will they reach those conclusions? This future pressing need will driving workers to consider Best Practice in inference. Right now, there are diverse approaches to inference, and it is not clear how to unify them into a self-consistent system. For example, there is not even universal agreement on how to treat probabilistic higher order logic. Quantum mechanics is held by many to be a universal system, but produces bizarre predictions for the everyday world of human experience. However, by rotation of the imaginary number i = of quantum mechanics to the split complex number h such that hh=+1, quantum mechanics becomes an inference system for higher order probabilistic logic. And the system has interesting emergent properties which may shed light on the nature of thought.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.