The access to high-quality data is essential to make accurate decisions. Consequently, when a database becomes inconsistent is crucial to restore its consistency. The main approach for database consistency restoration is based on the notion of repair. In this work, we use Argumentation techniques to provide a better understand of the reasoning process behind database reparation. We introduced an extended argumentation framework that provides a comprehensive and alternative way to identify, represent and resolve the conflicts between tuples in an inconsistent database. We studied the complexity of this framework and show that it can be used to check the optimality of a repair based on the extended notions of locally, semi-globally and globally optimal repair with respect to Denial Constraints and Tuple-Generating Dependencies classes.
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
Tel.: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300 firstname.lastname@example.org
(Corporate matters and books only) IOS Press c/o Accucoms US, Inc.
For North America Sales and Customer Service
West Point Commons
Lansdale PA 19446
Tel.: +1 866 855 8967
Fax: +1 215 660 5042 email@example.com