As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
The revenue management processes usually consist of four components: Forecasting, overbooking, seat inventory control and pricing ([McGill and van Ryzin, 1999]). In this test study at the Dutch low cost carrier transavia.com, a full subsidiary of Air France-KLM, a research is done to improve the forecasting component by testing demand forecasting methodologies with actual data some scheduled routes in a MatlabTM environment. The new revenue management software has been used since August 2008 and has given new opportunities for the revenue controllers to optimize their flights. The forecasting possibilities are however not yet tested.
In a research study, multiple methods are tested with data of the carrier. The additive pickup method turns out to perform the best on several criteria, but a lot of adjustments need to be made in order to give a valuable forecast for the revenue controllers. Important is the dataset that is given as input for the forecast, but also the way fare classes are used within the low cost environment has to be dealt with. This paper suggests three modifications to the basic additive pickup and evaluates them eventually in a simulated environment for the revenue controllers.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.