As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
Radiology reports are an essential communication method for ensuring smooth workflow in healthcare. However, many of these reports are described in free text, and findings documented by radiologists may not be adequately addressed. In this study, focusing on pulmonary nodules, we evaluated whether cases in which radiologists described follow-up as recommended were receiving appropriate treatment. Reports recommending follow-up for pulmonary nodules were automatically extracted using natural language processing. In our evaluation, out of 10,507 reports, 1,501 cases (14.3%) were classified as “reports recommending follow-up for pulmonary nodules.” Among these, 958 cases underwent additional imaging tests within 400 days. From the remaining 543 cases, we randomly sampled 42 cases and conducted chart reviews by clinicians to confirm patient care status. Our assessment found that follow-up was not documented in 17 of the 42 cases (40.5%), indicating a high likelihood that appropriate care was not provided.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.