As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
The threat related to explosive materials in the water domain has not yet gotten the attention it deserves. For many years in European Countries, this hazard was reduced to unexploded explosive ordnance (UXO) or abandoned explosive ordnance (AXO). During peacetime, Europe was focused on economic growth and governments, with public support, were cutting military spending below NATO’s target of 2% of GDP (Grand, 2023). The Navy was the first victim of the mandatory budget cuts. Investments in new equipment and the development of modern procedures were put on hold. The Russian attack on Ukraine and the Nord Stream sabotage was a wake-up call for most NATO members. An attack on EU vital maritime infrastructure with the help of sophisticated improvised devices, outdated widely used weapons and explosives, or unidentified ordnance is more likely than ever. At the same time, the size of the maritime area to be protected and the nature of the threats make it difficult to track the adversary and link the explosive event to a certain country or organization. If such devices are found within important maritime infrastructure or sensitive systems, non-violent methods may be used by Navy specialists to defeat the explosive weapons. NATO commitments to strengthen maritime capabilities are visible in the increased defense spending and the demand for new equipment and capabilities.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.