As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
Probable cause determinations are problematic. Like all court decisions using totality-of-the-circumstances tests, it is difficult to use one decision – or even a few – to foresee a subsequent outcome. No human is capable of reading all the relevant Fourth Amendment opinions relevant to resolving any search and seizure issue. Machines may be capable of this task and to do so they will need to be able to identify particular types of suspicious factors from the various ways courts describe the factors. This project examines the ability of three machine learning models to examine the relevant text of opinions to identify the suspicious factors courts used to determine whether adequate suspicion existed from an intrusion protected by the Fourth Amendment.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.