As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
To predict the air pollution level in a particular region area using an Innovative Logistic Regression algorithm compared with the Naive Bayes algorithm. The Logistic Regression Algorithm and the Naive Bayes Algorithm are two sets of algorithms. The algorithms were implemented and evaluated on a dataset of 32516 records. Various air pollution was identified through a programming experiment with N=5 iterations for each method. The threshold value is 0.05%, and the Confidence Interval is 95%. The G-power test used is about 80%. The innovative Logistic Regression algorithm (98.26%) has better accuracy when compared with Naive Bayes(97.32%). Logistic Regression has the highest accuracy in comparison to the Naive Bayes algorithm. Significance value for accuracy is 0.056(p>0.05), Precision 0.02(p<0.05) and recall 0.01(p<0.05) based on 2-tail analysis. Logistic Regression outperforms the Naive Bayes Algorithm in the prediction of air pollution.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.