As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
From theoretical computational perspectives, decision problems in Dung's abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) are either polynomial solvable or intractable. To investigate practical efficiency, theoretical evaluation of applied algorithms does not necessarily reveal performance dissimilarities. Although experimental analysis of algorithms is a well-established alternative exploited in other domains, such methodology is given a little attention in the context of AFs. The main purpose of this paper is to give an example of how such experiments can be conducted to get meaningful conclusions about algorithms' behavior in situations where theoretical analysis might be of little help. To this end, we pick an extended model of AFs as a case study to empirically examine the efficiency of algorithms related to the acceptability of arguments.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.