As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
In argumentation with incomplete information, an agent often needs to outsource justification of its arguments to other agents, having not sufficient arguments of its own to defend them. Formal characterisation of the impact of such common practice on agents' decision over which of its arguments are acceptable has not been well-investigated. We present an epistemic agent argumentation theory in which an agent can outsource justification of its arguments to its benefactors either by argumentation sharing or relegation. Semantics will be formulated.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.