Computerised dose prediction software assist clinicians in undertaking therapeutic drug monitoring by providing individualised dosing recommendations, typically communicated to prescribers in the form of a report. These software are highly sophisticated and accurate in predicting individualised dosage regimens, but if the information contained in the report is not understood by prescribers, the benefits of the software are not achieved. In this study, we set out to assess the perceived usability of a report generated from a dose prediction system. Fifteen prescribers were presented with a mock report and asked a number of questions to elicit their views of the report's content and design. Overall, we found that the mock report was effective in communicating the recommended dose of a drug, but this recommendation was presented alongside information that was not understood or was unlikely to be utilised by prescribers. In particular, the aspects of the report viewed negatively by end-users largely related to a lack of familiarity with the pharmacological terminology used in the report, which hindered understanding and caused confusion. Involving prescribers early on in the process of designing decision support systems is likely to result in systems and outputs that are more useful, usable and accessible to users.
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
Tel.: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300 email@example.com
(Corporate matters and books only) IOS Press c/o Accucoms US, Inc.
For North America Sales and Customer Service
West Point Commons
Lansdale PA 19446
Tel.: +1 866 855 8967
Fax: +1 215 660 5042 firstname.lastname@example.org