As a guest user you are not logged in or recognized by your IP address. You have
access to the Front Matter, Abstracts, Author Index, Subject Index and the full
text of Open Access publications.
This paper demonstrates how decision-making techniques can be used to balance diverse stakeholder views, especially engineers from multiple disciplines, toward approaching suitable fire engineered solutions for steel structures. Forty-two fire design stakeholders were interviewed for their opinions on selecting a suitable fire protection for structural steel buildings. The stakeholders compared and rated decision attributes. Their views were assessed using the Group-Analytic Network Process (G-ANP). The results show the priority trends from aggregated fire design stakeholder views and systematic ranking of the fire protection options toward suitable decision-making thereby highlighting the viability of the decision analysis techniques for transdisciplinary collaboration in structural fire design.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. They also allow us to analyze user behavior in order to constantly improve the website for you. Info about the privacy policy of IOS Press.