Two problem solving strategies, forward chaining and backward chaining, were compared to see how they affect students' learning of geometry theorem proving with construction. In order to determine which strategy accelerates learning the most, an intelligent tutoring system, the Advanced Geometry Tutor, was developed that can teach either strategy while controlling all other instructional variable. 52 students were randomly assigned to one of the two strategies. Although computational modeling suggests an advantage for backwards chaining, especially on construction problems, the result shows that (1) the students who learned forward chaining showed better performance on proof-writing, especially on the proofs with construction, than those who learned backward chaining, (2) both forward and backward chaining conditions wrote wrong proofs equally frequently, and (3) the major reason for the difficulty in applying backward chaining appears to lie in the assertion of premises as unjustified propositions (i.e., subgoaling).
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
Tel.: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300 email@example.com
(Corporate matters and books only) IOS Press c/o Accucoms US, Inc.
For North America Sales and Customer Service
West Point Commons
Lansdale PA 19446
Tel.: +1 866 855 8967
Fax: +1 215 660 5042 firstname.lastname@example.org